Attention: Fair Use rights reserved: Title 17 U.S.C. § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use -
For more information visit []
The act of providing articles and hyperlinks, as an expression of journalism, is to research and collect verifiable information, and does not constitute an endorsement of the "veracity of truths" or political-positions produced by the sources.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

2011-11-17 "Calif.: Regulating marijuana like wine improves the status quo"Despite having the broadest medical marijuana law in the country, California still arrests and cites individuals at a staggering pace [] for marijuana offenses. Efforts are underway to try to change that.
The Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012 [] is currently being circulated for signatures. If placed on the ballot,
the good people of California will be able to vote on whether adults should be able to possess, use, cultivate, and transport marijuana for non-medical use. In addition, the initiative would allow the legislature to devise a
system of retail marijuana cultivation and sale to adults. If passed, the Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act will greatly improve California's marijuana laws and show the federal government (and the world) that
allowing adults to make a responsible decision to use marijuana does not lead to chaos and ruin.
If you would like to help with the effort to place this initiative on the ballot, please visit the *Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act's website []
You can also forward this to your friends [] and associates across California to encourage them to be part of history.
[image: Robert Capecchi signature (master)]
Robert J. Capecchi
Legislative Analyst
Marijuana Policy Project

  *Help fund MPP's projects*
MPP hopes that each of the 100,000 subscribers on our national e-mail list will make at least one financial donation to MPP's work in 2011. Please click here [] to donate now.

MPP depends on the support of you and our other allies to fund our work [].
Together we will change marijuana laws.
*Popular Links:*
  - MPP's home page <>
  - MPP blog <>
  - MPP TV <>
  - MPP merchandise <>
  - FAQ <>
  - State-by-state medical marijuana laws <>
  - MPP news releases <>
  - 2011 strategic plan <>
  - Download hand-outs <>
  - About the Marijuana Policy Project <>
  - Why donate? <>

Friday, November 11, 2011

2011-11-11 "Cities can prohibit pot dispensaries, court rules" by Bob Egelko from "San Francisco Chronicle"
(11-11) 13:03 PST SAN FRANCISCO --
Cities and counties in California can prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries within their borders, a state appeals court has ruled.
Other courts have upheld local government authority to restrict the location of pot suppliers or declare a temporary moratorium, but Wednesday's ruling, in a case from Riverside, was the first to address a citywide ban.
A lawyer for a marijuana patients' cooperative called the ruling a "radical departure" from past cases - and from California's medical marijuana law - and said he would appeal to the state Supreme Court.
A 2003 state law was intended to "enhance access to medical marijuana" by allowing patients to grow and supply the drug through nonprofit collectives, attorney J. David Nick said Thursday. "How can you say you are enhancing access ... when you're permitting counties and cities to erode that very distribution system and to destroy it completely?"
Nick said an increasing number of cities, mostly in Southern California but also in the San Joaquin and Sacramento valleys, have outlawed marijuana dispensaries. A ban in all unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County is being challenged in court, Nick said.
Moves against industry
The ruling is another blow to medical marijuana suppliers in California, after last month's announcement by federal prosecutors throughout the state that they have threatened dozens of property owners with forfeiture and criminal charges for letting pot dispensaries rent office space.
Riverside banned medical marijuana outlets in 2009 and sought to shut down Nick's client, Inland Empire Patients' Health and Wellness Center, in May 2010. A Superior Court judge ruled in the city's favor six months later, but the center has stayed open during its appeal.
In Wednesday's ruling, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Riverside said state law allows medical patients to use marijuana, and to form collectives to supply it, but does not exempt them from local government authority to regulate land use.
Means of regulation
California laws "do not provide individuals with inalienable rights to establish, operate or use" dispensaries, nor do the laws declare that dispensaries "shall be permitted within every city and county," Justice Carol Codrington said in the 3-0 ruling.
State law expressly allows cities to regulate marijuana outlets or restrict their location, Codrington said, and a total ban is "simply a type or means of restriction or regulation."
Riverside's lawyer, Jeffrey Dunn, said the local bans grew out of short-term moratoriums that many cities adopted in response to an "explosive growth" of medical marijuana shops in the past five years.
California law provides patients and their authorized suppliers with a "limited immunity from criminal prosecution" while leaving cities and counties free to regulate or prohibit dispensaries, Dunn said.